Table of Contents
Legal process outsourcing by global capability centers (GCCs) is gaining popularity among companies seeking to streamline their legal tasks while maintaining control and confidentiality.
As a specialized business process outsourcing (BPO) model, this allows organizations to delegate activities such as contract review, compliance, and legal research to teams offshore or nearshore.
However, the legal landscape is complex, and missteps in structuring or managing these capabilities can result in significant compliance and operational risks. Understanding the potential pitfalls is essential for maximizing the value and minimizing the threats associated with legal process outsourcing by GCCs.
Differences between GCC and BPO
Before discussing GCC legal outsourcing, let us first focus on what BPO is and compare it with GCC.
GCCs and BPO firms differ in structure, control, and strategic intent. BPO is hiring third-party providers to perform specific functions, such as customer service, payroll, IT support, or data processing.
The outsourced GCC market is projected to reach $78.71 billion by 2032 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.79%. This rapid expansion reflects a growing preference among multinational companies for greater strategic control and operational depth.
Unlike traditional BPO firms, which are often cost-driven and transactional, GCCs are wholly owned offshore units that manage core business functions, including finance and accounting, analytics, research, and engineering. They offer tighter alignment with corporate goals and drive innovation, integration, and long-term value creation.
Critical pitfalls in legal process outsourcing by GCCs
GCCs have become a go-to solution for managing legal operations across borders, offering operational cost savings, scalability, and round-the-clock litigation support.
However, while they present clear advantages, many organizations encounter hidden challenges affecting compliance, performance, and legal effectiveness.
1. Inadequate due diligence on GCC capabilities
One of the most common mistakes in outsourcing the legal process to GCCs is failing to conduct thorough due diligence on the center’s capabilities. Law firms and organizations might assume that a GCC initial setup for IT or finance can seamlessly handle legal functions, which can lead to critical oversights.
Legal services demand domain expertise, local regulatory knowledge, and strict process adherence—qualities not all GCCs can deliver. For instance, a multinational firm once faced penalties when its GCC team mishandled data privacy reviews due to a lack of legal training and jurisdiction-specific expertise.
Evaluating the center’s legal competencies, certifications, and prior experience is essential before delegating sensitive legal work.
2. Misalignment of legal and business objectives
Research shows that 71% of fast-growing companies consistently rely on written plans, compared to 35% of smaller businesses. This highlights the value of clear, coordinated strategies.
Without this alignment, legal and business objectives can drift apart, weakening the effectiveness of legal process outsourcing through GCCs. When legal teams within the GCC operate in silos, they might focus heavily on risk mitigation.
At the same time, business units prioritize speed and adaptability, which can result in delays, conflicting advice, or missed opportunities. For instance, a global retailer faced stalled contract negotiations because its GCC legal team was not updated with evolving business terms, leading to repeated revisions and ultimately lost deals.
Ongoing communication and shared key performance indicators (KPIs) between legal and business stakeholders keep both sides aligned and responsive.
3. Insufficient understanding of local legal frameworks
Legal process outsourcing by GCCs can quickly run into trouble if teams lack a deep understanding of local laws and regulations. Legal systems vary widely across jurisdictions. Even minor misinterpretations can expose the business to fines, litigation, or compliance breaches.
This is especially critical for labor law, data privacy, and industry-specific regulations. A tech company expanding into Southeast Asia encountered regulatory delays when its GCC legal team failed to account for local disclosure requirements during a merger.
To mitigate such risks, GCCs should invest in region-specific legal training and engage local counsel when necessary.
4. Poorly defined service-level agreements (SLAs)
Poorly defined SLAs can severely affect the performance and accountability of legal process outsourcing through capability centers. Without clear expectations around turnaround times, scope of work, confidentiality standards, and quality metrics, legal teams might underdeliver or misprioritize tasks.
This ambiguity creates friction between the GCC and business units, especially when critical legal work is delayed or inconsistently handled. In one case, a financial services firm suffered reputational damage when its GCC failed to respond to a regulatory inquiry on time due to vague SLA guidelines.
Well-structured SLAs with measurable KPIs and escalation protocols drive accountability and trust.
5. Lack of clear communication channels
Effective legal process outsourcing by GCCs depends heavily on strong, transparent communication channels. Without structured touchpoints, legal teams can become disconnected from business priorities, timelines, and evolving legal risks.
Miscommunication often leads to duplicate work, delays in approvals, and inconsistent legal interpretations. A global logistics company experienced repeated contract errors when its in-house counsel and GCC legal team worked on separate versions due to fragmented communication tools.
Establishing clear workflows, centralized platforms, and regular sync-ups ensures alignment and minimizes costly misunderstandings.
6. Inadequate data security and confidentiality measures
Legal functions handle highly sensitive information, making data security and confidentiality critical in legal process outsourcing through GCCs. Inadequate safeguards, such as weak access controls, poor encryption standards, or non-compliance with privacy laws, can expose the organization to serious legal and reputational risks.
Legal documents often contain privileged information, trade secrets, or regulatory disclosures that require utmost protection. According to Cisco’s 2025 Data Privacy Benchmark Study, 95% of customers say they would refuse to do business with a company that fails to adequately protect their data, underscoring the high stakes of trust and compliance.
A healthcare provider, for instance, faced regulatory scrutiny when its GCC team inadvertently stored confidential legal records on unsecured servers, breaching Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) compliance.
To mitigate such risks, GCCs must implement robust data governance protocols, conduct regular audits, and ensure staff receive thorough training on confidentiality best practices.
7. Failure to monitor and evaluate GCC performance
Ongoing monitoring and evaluation are crucial to the long-term success of legal process outsourcing by GCCs. Without consistent performance reviews, leadership may overlook inefficiencies, compliance gaps, or declining service quality.
Over time, this lack of visibility can lead to process drift, missed deadlines, and growing dissatisfaction among business stakeholders.
A multinational manufacturer discovered recurring legal errors only after a major audit revealed the GCC team had been operating without supervision for over a year.
Regular performance tracking, feedback loops, and continuous improvement plans help ensure the GCC remains aligned with legal standards and business expectations.
8. Overlooking cultural and operational differences
Overlooking cultural and operational differences can create serious friction in the legal process outsourcing through GCCs. Differences in work styles, communication norms, and decision-making processes may lead to misunderstandings, delays, or mismatched expectations.
Legal tasks often require nuance, context, and precision, qualities that can be compromised when teams are not culturally aligned.
A U.S.-based corporation experienced contract disputes when its GCC legal team, based overseas, interpreted negotiation practices differently, causing missteps in tone and content.
Bridging cultural gaps through training, collaboration, and shared protocols is key to ensuring seamless and effective legal operations.
9. Neglecting to update contracts with regulatory changes
Neglecting to update contracts in response to evolving regulations is a critical risk in legal process outsourcing by GCCs. Regulatory landscapes shift frequently, especially in data privacy, labor laws, and cross-border compliance.
The organization might face legal exposure or non-compliance penalties if the GCC legal team does not monitor and update contract language. For instance, a software company faced fines when outdated clauses in client contracts failed to reflect new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requirements, oversights that went unnoticed by their GCC.
GCCs must establish processes for legal horizon scanning and systematic contract drafting to stay compliant.
10. Underestimating the importance of change management
Underestimating the importance of change management can derail even the most well-planned legal process outsourcing through GCCs. Shifting legal operations to a new structure often affects workflows, roles, and expectations across the organization.
Without a clear change management strategy, teams might resist adoption, communication might break down, and productivity can suffer.
One global enterprise faced internal pushback and delayed outcomes because its legal staff was not adequately prepared or trained to transition to a GCC model.
Successful implementation requires stakeholder engagement, clear communication, training, and continuous support throughout the change process.
The bottom line
Legal process outsourcing by GCCs offers strategic benefits. However, it also comes with risks that can compromise compliance, efficiency, and trust if not carefully managed.
The pitfalls we’ve outlined, from inadequate due diligence to change management failures, represent the difference between transformative success and costly operational disruption.
Organizations that proactively address these challenges don’t just avoid risks. They create sustainable competitive advantages through enhanced legal efficiency, reduced costs, and improved compliance posture.
Proactively identifying and addressing these challenges is key to unlocking the full value of a GCC legal model. Optimize your legal outsourcing strategy with a smarter, safer GCC framework. Let’s connect.
